Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca
  1. Pubblicazioni

Differential EUS findings in focal type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer: A proof-of-concept study

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2022
Citazione:
Differential EUS findings in focal type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer: A proof-of-concept study / Tacelli, Matteo; Zaccari, Piera; Petrone, Maria Chiara; Della Torre, Emanuel; Lanzillotta, Marco; Falconi, Massimo; Doglioni, Claudio; Capurso, Gabriele; Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio. - In: ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND. - ISSN 2303-9027. - 11:3(2022), pp. 216-222. [10.4103/EUS-D-21-00111]
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) often mimics pancreatic cancer (PC), particularly if presenting as a focal lesion. EUS may orient the differential diagnosis between them. This study aims to identify EUS findings that might be useful to differentiate type 1 focal autoimmune pancreatitis (f-AIP1) and PC. Materials and Methods: F-AIP1 and PC patients were retrospectively collected, matched, and compared. EUS findings considered were: focal mass echogenicity, loss of lobularity, distal atrophy, peripancreatic hypoechoic margins (PHM), pancreatic duct dilation, duct-penetrating sign (DPS), pancreatic/common bile duct thickened walls (PD/CBD-TW), and vessel infiltration (VI). Elastography findings were also recorded. Variables with a P < 0.05 at univariate analysis were included in logistic multiple regression. Results: Fifteen patients with f-AIP and 60 with PC were studied. FE was hypoechoic in all patients from both groups. PHM was observed in 40% of f-AIP1 cases but not in PC ones (P < 0.001). DPS was found in 10/15 (66.7%) f-AIP1 and in 7/60 (11.7%) PC patients (P < 0.001). PD-TW and CBD-TW were observed in 66.7%/60% f-AIP1 cases and in 6.7%/13.6% PC patients, respectively (P < 0.001 for both comparisons). Pancreatic masses were significantly different at EUS elastography (elastic respectively in 71.4% f-AIP1 and 3.8% PC, P < 0.001). VI was suspected in 20% of f-AIPs and 85% of PCs (P < 0.001). At multiple regression, PD-TW, CBD-TW, elastic pattern, and the absence of VI independently supported a diagnosis of f-AIP1. Conclusions: Our results suggest that EUS findings deserve consideration in the diagnostic workup of AIP to improve the differential diagnosis with PC.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
EUS; PDAC; autoimmune pancreatitis; contrast; diagnosis; elastography
Elenco autori:
Tacelli, Matteo; Zaccari, Piera; Petrone, Maria Chiara; Della Torre, Emanuel; Lanzillotta, Marco; Falconi, Massimo; Doglioni, Claudio; Capurso, Gabriele; Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio
Autori di Ateneo:
ARCIDIACONO PAOLO GIORGIO
CAPURSO GABRIELE
DELLA TORRE EMANUEL
FALCONI MASSIMO
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/135492
Pubblicato in:
ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0