Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca
  1. Pubblicazioni

Benefits and Harms of Lung Cancer Screening by Chest Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2021
Citazione:
Benefits and Harms of Lung Cancer Screening by Chest Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis / Passiglia, Francesco; Cinquini, Michela; Bertolaccini, Luca; Del Re, Marzia; Facchinetti, Francesco; Ferrara, R; Franchina, Tindara; Larici Anna, R.; Malapelle, Umberto; Menis, Jessica; Passaro, Antonio; Pilotto, Sara; Ramella, Sara; Rossi, Giulio; Trisolini, Rocco; Novello, Silvia. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1527-7755. - 9:5(2021), pp. 1143-1161. [10.1200/JCO.20.02574]
Abstract:
PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aims to combine and analyze randomized clinical trials comparing computed tomography lung screening (CTLS) versus either no screening (NS) or chest x-ray (CXR) in subjects with cigarette smoking history, to provide a precise and reliable estimation of the benefits and harms associated with CTLS.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from all published randomized trials comparing CTLS versus either NS or CXR in a highly tobacco-exposed population were collected, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Subgroup analyses by comparator (NS or CXR) were performed. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and relative 95% CIs were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.RESULTS: Nine eligible trials (88,497 patients) were included. Pooled analysis showed that CTLS is associated with: a significant reduction of lung cancer-related mortality (overall RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.98; NS RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.92); a significant increase of early-stage tumors diagnosis (overall RR, 2.84; 95% CI 1.76 to 4.58; NS RR, 3.33; 95% CI, 2.27 to 4.89; CXR RR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.23); a significant decrease of late-stage tumors diagnosis (overall RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.83; NS RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.80); a significant increase of resectability rate (NS RR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.76 to 3.74); a nonsignificant reduction of all-cause mortality (overall RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.05); and a significant increase of overdiagnosis rate (NS, 38%; 95% CI, 14 to 63). The analysis of lung cancer-related mortality by sex revealed nonsignificant differences between men and women (P = .21; I-squared = 33.6%).CONCLUSION: Despite there still being uncertainty about overdiagnosis estimate, this meta-analysis suggested that the CTLS benefits outweigh harms, in subjects with cigarette smoking history, ultimately supporting the systematic implementation of lung cancer screening worldwide.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1.3. Articolo in Rivista - Editorial, Comment, Reply
Elenco autori:
Passiglia, Francesco; Cinquini, Michela; Bertolaccini, Luca; Del Re, Marzia; Facchinetti, Francesco; Ferrara, R; Franchina, Tindara; Larici Anna, R.; Malapelle, Umberto; Menis, Jessica; Passaro, Antonio; Pilotto, Sara; Ramella, Sara; Rossi, Giulio; Trisolini, Rocco; Novello, Silvia
Autori di Ateneo:
FERRARA ROBERTO
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/176479
Pubblicato in:
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.6.1.0