Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca
  1. Pubblicazioni

Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2023
Citazione:
Real-world validation of Artificial Intelligence-based Computed Tomography auto-contouring for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning / Palazzo, Gabriele; Mangili, Paola; Deantoni, Chiara; Fodor, Andrei; Broggi, Sara; Castriconi, Roberta; Ubeira Gabellini, Maria Giulia; Del Vecchio, Antonella; Di Muzio, Nadia G.; Fiorino, Claudio. - In: PHYSICS AND IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 2405-6316. - 28:(2023). [10.1016/j.phro.2023.100501]
Abstract:
Background and purpose: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based auto-contouring for treatment planning in radiotherapy needs extensive clinical validation, including the impact of editing after automatic segmentation. The aims of this study were to assess the performance of a commercial system for Clinical Target Volumes (CTVs) (prostate/seminal vesicles) and selected Organs at Risk (OARs) (rectum/bladder/femoral heads + femurs), evaluating also inter-observer variability (manual vs automatic + editing) and the reduction of contouring time.Materials and methods: Two expert observers contoured CTVs/OARs of 20 patients in our Treatment Planning System (TPS). Computed Tomography (CT) images were sent to the automatic contouring workstation: automatic contours were generated and sent back to TPS, where observers could edit them if necessary. Inter- and intra-observer consistency was estimated using Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC). Radiation oncologists were also asked to score the quality of automatic contours, ranging from 1 (complete re-contouring) to 5 (no editing). Contouring times (manual vs automatic + edit) were compared.Results: DSCs (manual vs automatic only) were consistent with inter-observer variability (between 0.65 for seminal vesicles and 0.94 for bladder); editing further improved performances (range: 0.76-0.94). The median clinical score was 4 (little editing) and it was <4 in 3/2 patients for the two observers respectively. Inter-observer variability of automatic + editing contours improved significantly, being lower than manual contouring (e.g.: seminal vesicles: 0.83vs0.73; prostate: 0.86vs0.83; rectum: 0.96vs0.81). Oncologist contouring time reduced from 17 to 24 min of manual contouring time to 3-7 min of editing time for the two observers (p < 0.01).Conclusion: Automatic contouring with a commercial AI-based system followed by editing can replace manual contouring, resulting in significantly reduced time for segmentation and better consistency between operators.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Elenco autori:
Palazzo, Gabriele; Mangili, Paola; Deantoni, Chiara; Fodor, Andrei; Broggi, Sara; Castriconi, Roberta; Ubeira Gabellini, Maria Giulia; Del Vecchio, Antonella; Di Muzio, Nadia G.; Fiorino, Claudio
Autori di Ateneo:
DI MUZIO NADIA GISELLA
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/170896
Link al Full Text:
https://iris.unisr.it//retrieve/handle/20.500.11768/170896/250200/2023%20Real%20worls%20validation%20of%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20based%20Physics%20and%20imaging%20in%20radiation%20oncology.pdf
Pubblicato in:
PHYSICS AND IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY
Journal
  • Dati Generali

Dati Generali

URL

https://www.phiro.science/article/S2405-6316(23)00092-1/fulltext
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.2.0