Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca
  1. Pubblicazioni

Looking Beyond Dose: Identifying Responders and Non-Responders to RehaCom Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation in Progressive MS—The CogEx Study

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2026
Citazione:
Looking Beyond Dose: Identifying Responders and Non-Responders to RehaCom Computerized Cognitive Rehabilitation in Progressive MS—The CogEx Study / Meza, Cecilia; Hernandez, Roberto S.; Costa, Silvana L.; Salter, Amber; Chiaravalloti, Nancy D.; Amato, Maria Pia; Brichetto, Giampaolo; Chataway, Jeremy; Cutter, Gary; Dalgas, Ulrik; Deluca, John; Farrell, Rachel; Feys, Peter; Filippi, Massimo; Freeman, Jennifer; Inglese, Matilde; Motl, Robert W.; Rocca, Maria A.; Sandroff, Brian M.; Feinstein, Anthony; Null, Null. - In: NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR. - ISSN 1545-9683. - (2026). [Epub ahead of print] [10.1177/15459683261432556]
Abstract:
: BackgroundRehaCom, a computerized cognitive rehabilitation program for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), has been studied primarily in relation to treatment "dose" (duration, frequency, and adherence), with less focus on which training modules drive improvement or which participant factors predict responsiveness. This secondary analysis of the CogEx trial investigated whether progression within specific RehaCom modules was associated with processing speed improvement, measured by the SDMT, and whether baseline characteristics predicted response in participants with progressive MS.MethodsA total of 153 participants completed 12 weeks of RehaCom training across 5 attention-based modules. Cognition was assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months using the SDMT. Correlation and regression analyses evaluated associations between module progression and cognitive outcomes.ResultsProgression correlated significantly with SDMT improvement in 4 modules, with the strongest effects for Attention/Concentration (r = .37, P < .001) and Divided Attention-2 (r = .36, P < .001). Higher baseline SDMT, higher premorbid IQ, older age, and greater module progression independently predicted better SDMT performance at12-weeks (adjusted R2 = .73). At 6 months, higher baseline SDMT, greater progression in Attention/Concentration and Divided Attention-2, older age, and female sex predicted better SDMT performance (adjusted R2 = .71).ConclusionProcessing speed gains in progressive MS were related to both module-specific progression and participant characteristics, supporting a precision approach to cognitive rehabilitation that tailors training content to individual cognitive profiles. This study is a secondary analysis of the CogEx trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03679468; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03679468).
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Elenco autori:
Meza, Cecilia; Hernandez, Roberto S.; Costa, Silvana L.; Salter, Amber; Chiaravalloti, Nancy D.; Amato, Maria Pia; Brichetto, Giampaolo; Chataway, Jeremy; Cutter, Gary; Dalgas, Ulrik; Deluca, John; Farrell, Rachel; Feys, Peter; Filippi, Massimo; Freeman, Jennifer; Inglese, Matilde; Motl, Robert W.; Rocca, Maria A.; Sandroff, Brian M.; Feinstein, Anthony; Null, Null
Autori di Ateneo:
FILIPPI MASSIMO
ROCCA MARIA ASSUNTA
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/201860
Pubblicato in:
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0