Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Metabolic Phenotype of Stage 1 and Stage 2 Type 1 Diabetes Using Modeling of β Cell Function

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2025
Short description:
Metabolic Phenotype of Stage 1 and Stage 2 Type 1 Diabetes Using Modeling of β Cell Function / Galderisi, A., Bonet, J., Ismail, H.M., Moran, A., Fiorina, P., Bosi, E., Petrelli, A.. - In: THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM. - ISSN 0021-972X. - 110:11(2025), pp. 3168-3178. [10.1210/clinem/dgaf086]
abstract:
Background: Staging preclinical type 1 diabetes (T1D) and monitoring the response to disease-modifying treatments rely on the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). However, it is unknown whether OGTT-derived measures of beta cell function can detect subtle changes in metabolic phenotype, thus limiting their usability as endpoints in prevention trials. Objective: To describe the metabolic phenotype of people with Stage 1 and Stage 2 T1D using metabolic modelling of β cell function. Methods: We characterized the metabolic phenotype of individuals with islet autoimmunity in the absence (Stage 1) or presence (Stage 2) of dysglycemia. Participants were screened at a TrialNet site and underwent a 5-point, 2-hour OGTT. Standard measures of insulin secretion (area under the curve, C-peptide, Homeostatic Model Assessment [HOMA] 2-B) and sensitivity (HOMA Insulin Resistance, HOMA2-S, Matsuda Index) and oral minimal model–derived insulin secretion (φ total), sensitivity (sensitivity index), and clearance were adopted to characterize the cohort. Results: Thirty participants with Stage 1 and 27 with Stage 2T1D were selected. Standard metrics of insulin secretion and sensitivity did not differ between Stage 1 and Stage 2 T1D, while the oral minimal model revealed lower insulin secretion (P < .001) and sensitivity (P = .034) in those with Stage 2 T1D, as well as increased insulin clearance (P = .006). A higher baseline φ total was associated with reduced odds of disease progression, independent of stage (OR 0.92 [0.86, 0.98], P = .016). Conclusion: The oral minimal model describes the differential metabolic phenotype of Stage 1 and Stage 2 T1D and identifies the φ total as a progression predictor. This supports its use as a sensitive tool and endpoint for T1D prevention trials.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
List of contributors:
Galderisi, A.; Bonet, J.; Ismail, H. M.; Moran, A.; Fiorina, P.; Bosi, E.; Petrelli, A.
Authors of the University:
BOSI EMANUELE
Handle:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/207215
Full Text:
https://iris.unisr.it//retrieve/handle/20.500.11768/207215/374931/dgaf086.pdf
Published in:
THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM
Journal
  • Overview

Overview

URL

https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/110/11/3168/8037857?login=false
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.9.0.0