Can we expand active surveillance criteria to include biopsy Gleason 3+4 prostate cancer? A multi-institutional study of 2,323 patients
Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2015
Abstract:
Objective: To test the expandability of active surveillance (AS) to Gleason score 3+4 cancers by assessing the unfavorable disease risk in a large multi-institutional cohort. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis including 2,323 patients with localized Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer who underwent a radical prostatectomy between 2005 and 2013 from 6 academic centers. We analyzed the rates of biopsy downgrading/upgrading and advanced stage in the overall cohort by employing standardized AS criteria (using biopsy Gleason score 3+4). Results: The final pathologic Gleason score was 3+3 = 6 in 8%, 3+4 = 7 in 67%, 4+3 = 7 in 20%, and 8 to 10 in 5% cases. The overall rate of unfavorable disease (upgrading or advanced stage or both) was 46%. In multivariable analysis, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level>10. ng/ml, PSA density (PSAD) >0.15. ng/ml/g, clinical stage >T1, and>2 positive cores were predictors of unfavorable disease. According to the AS criteria used, the risk of unfavorable disease ranged from 30% to 42%. In patients without any risk factor (PSA levelâ ¤10. ng/ml, PSAD â ¤0.15. ng/ml/g, T1c, andâ ¤2 positive cores), the unfavorable disease rate was 19%. The main limitations of this study are the retrospective design and nonstandardization of pathologic assessment between centers. Conclusions: Approximately half of patients with biopsy Gleason score 3+4 cancer have unfavorable disease at final pathology. Nevertheless, expanding AS eligibility to these patients may be acceptable provided adherence to strict selection criteria leading to a<20% risk of unfavorable disease. Future tools for selection such as magnetic resonance imaging, early rebiopsy, and serum markers may be especially beneficial in this group of patients.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Active surveillance; Gleason score; Outcomes; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Reclassification; Aged; Cohort Studies; Epidemiological Monitoring; Humans; Image-Guided Biopsy; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Grading; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Oncology; Urology
Elenco autori:
Ploussard, Guillaume; Isbarn, Hendrik; Briganti, Alberto; Sooriakumaran, Prasanna; Surcel, Christian I.; Salomon, Laurent; Freschi, Massimo; Mirvald, Cristian; van der Poel, Henk G.; Jenkins, Anna; Ost, Piet; van Oort, Inge M.; Yossepowitch, Ofer; Giannarini, Gianluca; van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
Link alla scheda completa:
Pubblicato in: