Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca
  1. Pubblicazioni

Diastasis recti abdominis after childbirth: Is it a predictor of stress urinary incontinence?

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2020
Citazione:
Diastasis recti abdominis after childbirth: Is it a predictor of stress urinary incontinence? / Braga, A.; Caccia, G.; Nasi, I.; Ruggeri, G.; Di Dedda, M. C.; Lamberti, G.; Salvatore, S.; Papadia, A.; Serati, M.. - In: JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION. - ISSN 2468-7847. - 49:10(2020), p. 101657. [10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.101657]
Abstract:
Introduction: Pregnancy and childbirth are considered risk factors for the development of diastasis recti abdominis (DRA). This anatomical change could be on the basis of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the value of DRA and SUI, in order to understand, if a specific abdominal rehabilitation might be indicated. Methods: All women with clinically and urodynamically proven SUI (group 1) 6 months after first childbirth, have been enrolled and compared with women without any symptoms of SUI (group 2). Exclusion criteria were age > 45 years, pelvic organ prolapse > II stage, previous abdominal surgery including cesarean section, BMI (Body Mass Index) > 30, previous weight loss > 10 kg, presence of abdominal hernia, and pathological connective tissue laxity. Physical examination and ultrasound measurement of DRA were performed. DRA in women with SUI were compared with DRA in continent women. Results: During the study period, 35 (48 %) incontinent women were included in group 1 and 38 (52 %) continent women were included in group 2. The two groups did not differ in any characteristics. No statistically significant differences in the mean value of DRA, 1.76 cm (±0.81 DS) in group 1 versus 1.69 (±0.79 DS) in group 2 (p value = 0.91), were found. Conclusions: DRA is not a risk factor for SUI. Therefore, an intervention on the abdominal muscles during pelvic floor rehabilitation for SUI does not seem to be justified.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Childbirth; Diastasis recti abdominis; Pelvic floor dysfunctions; Pelvic floor muscle training; Pregnancy; Stress urinary incontinence
Elenco autori:
Braga, A.; Caccia, G.; Nasi, I.; Ruggeri, G.; Di Dedda, M. C.; Lamberti, G.; Salvatore, S.; Papadia, A.; Serati, M.
Autori di Ateneo:
SALVATORE STEFANO
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/105650
Pubblicato in:
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0