Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Metal versus Fiberglass Post-Orthodontic Retainers Short-Term Effects on Plaque Index and Microbial Colonization: An Observational Study

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2022
Short description:
Metal versus Fiberglass Post-Orthodontic Retainers Short-Term Effects on Plaque Index and Microbial Colonization: An Observational Study / Mummolo, S., Quinzi, V., Nota, A., Marino, C., Pittari, L., Manenti, R.J., Tecco, S.. - In: LIFE. - ISSN 2075-1729. - 12:3(2022), p. 331. [10.3390/life12030331]
abstract:
In orthodontics, post-treatment retention phase is crucial for maintaining the obtained clinical results. In cases of crowding, a bonded fixed retainer is often chosen to maintain teeth alignment in the anterior sector of the lower dental arch. A fixed retainer can remain in the mouth for years. Therefore, it is important that it is applied with harmless materials for the level of plaque control. The present study aimed to investigate the salivary concentrations of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Lactobacilli, and the Sillness and Loe plaque index, in patients wearing metal wire versus fiberglass orthodontic retainers. Forty post-orthodontic patients were included in the sample: in 20 subjects a metal wire retainer was applied (MR), while in the others a fiberglass retainer was applied (FR). The variables were recorded at baseline (T0), after 1 month (T1), and after 2 months (T2) of follow-up. The percentage of patients with a level of S. mutans and Lactobacilli colonization > 10(5) increased over time in the FR group (T0 = 0%, T1 = 5%, T2 = 35%), compared with the MR group. PI increased in the FR group (T0 = 0, T1 = 14, T2 = 27), and remained almost the same in the MR group (T0 = 3, T1 = 0, T2 = 2). From the present results it appears that the metal wire retainer is better than the fiberglass retainer for the level of plaque control performed by the patients.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
fiberglass; interceptive orthodontics; lactobacilli; metal; orthodontic fixed appliances; orthodontic materials; pediatric dentistry; post-orthodontic retainer; streptococcus mutans
List of contributors:
Mummolo, Stefano; Quinzi, Vincenzo; Nota, Alessandro; Marino, Carla; Pittari, Laura; Manenti, Rebecca Jewel; Tecco, Simona
Authors of the University:
NOTA ALESSANDRO
TECCO SIMONA
Handle:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/132633
Published in:
LIFE
Journal
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.7.2.0