Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca
  1. Pubblicazioni

Immune checkpoint inhibitors versus second line chemotherapy for patients with lung cancer refractory to first line chemotherapy

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2020
Citazione:
Immune checkpoint inhibitors versus second line chemotherapy for patients with lung cancer refractory to first line chemotherapy / Lefebvre, C.; Martin, E.; Hendriks, L. E. L.; Veillon, R.; Puisset, F.; Mezquita, L.; Ferrara, R; Sabatier, M.; Filleron, T.; Dingemans, A. -M. C.; Besse, B.; Raherisson, C.; Mazières, J.. - In: RESPIRATORY MEDICINE AND RESEARCH. - ISSN 2590-0412. - 9:5(2020), pp. 1143-1161. [10.1016/j.resmer.2020.100788]
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Anti Programmed Death-ligand (PD1/PD-L1) directed immune-checkpoint-inhibitors (ICI) are widely used to treat patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progress after first line chemotherapy. The best strategy after early progression under first line has not been specifically studied.PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study including all consecutive NSCLC patients progressing within the first 3 months following introduction of first-line chemotherapy and being treated with second line ICI monotherapy or chemotherapy between March 2010 and November 2017. We analysed the clinicopathological data and outcome under second line chemotherapy vs. second line ICI: objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS.RESULTS: We identified 176 patients with refractory disease, 99 who received subsequent immunotherapy and 77 undergoing chemotherapy. The 2 populations were comparable regarding the main prognostic criteria, median age was 60, main histology was adenocarcimoma (68.2%). PFS was not significantly different between both treatments 1.9 [1.8-2.1] versus 1.6 month [1.4-2.0] (P=0.125). Compared to chemotherapy, ICI treated patients had a superior OS (P=0.03) (Median [95% CI] OS 4.6 [2.8-6.7] versus 4.2 months [3.4-5.9] and a non-significant improvement in ORR (17.2% versus 7.9%, respectively, P=0.072). Poor performance status (ECOG PS≥2) and a higher number of metastatic sites (≥3) were associated with poorer prognosis. KRAS-mutated patients did not seem to benefit more from ICI than chemotherapy.CONCLUSIONS: ICI appears to be the preferred second-line treatment for patients who are refractory to first line chemotherapy.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1.3. Articolo in Rivista - Editorial, Comment, Reply
Elenco autori:
Lefebvre, C.; Martin, E.; Hendriks, L. E. L.; Veillon, R.; Puisset, F.; Mezquita, L.; Ferrara, R; Sabatier, M.; Filleron, T.; Dingemans, A. -M. C.; Besse, B.; Raherisson, C.; Mazières, J.
Autori di Ateneo:
FERRARA ROBERTO
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/176396
Pubblicato in:
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE AND RESEARCH
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.6.0.0