Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

The role of drug-eluting balloons alone or in combination with drug-eluting stents in the treatment of de novo diffuse coronary disease

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2013
Short description:
The role of drug-eluting balloons alone or in combination with drug-eluting stents in the treatment of de novo diffuse coronary disease / Costopoulos, C., Latib, A., Naganuma, T., Sticchi, A., Figini, F., Basavarajaiah, S., Carlino, M., Chieffo, A., Montorfano, M., Naim, C., Kawaguchi, M., Giannini, F., Colombo, A.. - In: JACC. CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS. - ISSN 1876-7605. - (2013). [10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.005]
abstract:
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the role of drug-eluting balloons (DEB) alone or in combination with drug-eluting stents (DES) in the treatment of diffuse de novo coronary artery disease (CAD) (>25 mm).BACKGROUND: The use of DEB in diffuse CAD, either alone or in combination with DES, offers an alternative to stenting alone. Data regarding DEB in this context are limited.METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all patients treated with DEB for diffuse CAD between June 2009 and October 2012. Endpoints analyzed were major adverse cardiac events, defined as all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR), as well as TVR and target lesion revascularization separately. Results were compared with those obtained from a cohort of patients with similar characteristics treated with DES alone.RESULTS: A total of 69 patients (93 lesions) were treated with DEB ± DES, and 93 patients with DES alone (93 lesions). A high proportion of patients were diabetic (46.4% vs. 44.1%, p = 0.77). Of the DEB-treated lesions, 56.0% were treated with DEB alone, 7.4% with DEB and DES as bail out, and 36.6% with DES and DEB as part of a hybrid approach for very long disease. Outcome rates with DEB ± DES were comparable to those with DES alone at 2-year follow-up (major adverse cardiac events = 20.8% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.74; TVR = 14.8% vs. 11.5%, p = 0.44; target lesion revascularization = 9.6% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.84).CONCLUSIONS: DEB may have a role in the treatment of diffuse de novo CAD, either alone in smaller vessels or in combination with DES in very long disease.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
List of contributors:
Costopoulos, Charis; Latib, Azeem; Naganuma, Toru; Sticchi, Alessandro; Figini, Filippo; Basavarajaiah, Sandeep; Carlino, Mauro; Chieffo, Alaide; Montorfano, M; Naim, Charbel; Kawaguchi, Masanori; Giannini, Francesco; Colombo, Antonio
Authors of the University:
CHIEFFO ALAIDE
Handle:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/143264
Published in:
JACC. CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
Journal
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.2.0