Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Performance of Tandem Control IQ during outdoor physical activity in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2024
Short description:
Performance of Tandem Control IQ during outdoor physical activity in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes / Mameli, C., Rigamonti, A., Felappi, B., Nicolucci, A., Lucisano, G., Baresi, S., Florini, G., Macedoni, M., Petitti, A., Hajro, A., Tortu, G., Pistone, C., Guerraggio, P., Zampolli, M., Zuccotti, G.V., Bonfanti, R.. - In: DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS. - ISSN 1557-8593. - 26:2(2024). [10.1089/dia.2023.0324]
abstract:
Background: Few data are available in children with type 1 diabetes using automated insulin delivery systems during physical activity (PA). We evaluated the time in range (TIR) during 2-h of outdoor PA in children using t:slim X2 with Control-IQ (R) technology.Materials and Methods: Caucasian children and adolescents, aged 9-18 years using t:slim X2 with Control-IQ technology were recruited during a local sporting event. Participants were divided into two groups: Group A practiced endurance activities for 60 min (1000-meter run, a jump circuit) and then power activities for 60 min (80-meter run, long jump); Group B practiced power activities for 60 min and then followed by endurance activities for 60 min. Ninety minutes before the PA, participants had lunch and self-administered a low-dose insulin, reduced by 50% compared to their regularly calculated meal dose per pump calculator. DexcomG6 (R) data were downloaded.Results: Twenty-six children were recruited, 2 refused PA. Participants were divided as follows: 13 in Group A (7 males, median age 14.6 years) and 11 in Group B (8 males, median age 13.5 year). The mean glucose level when PA started was similar between groups (P = 0.06). Subjects in Group B showed a higher TIR than those in Group A ([50.4%, 95% confidence interval, CI: 33.8-75] vs. 39.6% [95% CI: 26.9-58.3], respectively [P = 0.39]). A significantly better TIR in Group B (53.8%, 95% CI: 30.2-96.1) compared to Group A (17.4%, 95% CI: 7.3-41.7, P = 0.02) was recorded during the first session. During the second session, TIR increased in both groups. There were no episodes of serious or severe hypoglycemia.Conclusions: No serious or severe hypoglycemic episodes were recorded during PA performed 90 min after lunch. Future studies using t:slim X2 with Control-IQ technology are necessary.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Automated insulin system; Children; Hypoglycemia; Tandem Control IQ; Time in range; Type 1 diabetes
List of contributors:
Mameli, Chiara; Rigamonti, Andrea; Felappi, Barbara; Nicolucci, Antonio; Lucisano, Giuseppe; Baresi, Stefanoi; Florini, Giorgia; Macedoni, Maddalena; Petitti, Agnese; Hajro, Adelina; Tortu, Giacomo; Pistone, Carmelo; Guerraggio, Paola; Zampolli, Maria; Zuccotti, Gian Vincenzo; Bonfanti, Riccardo
Authors of the University:
BONFANTI RICCARDO
Handle:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/153937
Published in:
DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Journal
  • Overview

Overview

URL

https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/dia.2023.0324
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.9.0.0