Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: long-term survival analysis of the DESTINY-Breast03 trial

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2024
Short description:
Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: long-term survival analysis of the DESTINY-Breast03 trial / Cortes, J., Hurvitz, S.A., Im, S.-A., Iwata, H., Curigliano, G., Kim, S.-B., Chiu, J.W.Y., Pedrini, J.L., Li, W., Yonemori, K., Bianchini, G., Loi, S., Borges, G.S., Wang, X., Bachelot, T., Nakatani, S., Ashfaque, S., Liang, Z., Egorov, A., Hamilton, E.. - In: NATURE MEDICINE. - ISSN 1078-8956. - 30:8(2024), pp. 2208-2215. [10.1038/s41591-024-03021-7]
abstract:
Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) demonstrated significantly improved efficacy over trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in DESTINY-Breast03 (median follow-up, 28 months). We report updated efficacy and safety analyses, including secondary and exploratory efficacy endpoints (median follow-up, 41 months) of DESTINY-Breast03. Patients with advanced HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with taxane and trastuzumab were randomized to T-DXd (5.4 mg per kg (261 patients)) or T-DM1 (3.6 mg per kg (263 patients)). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review and was previously reported. The key secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Other secondary endpoints included objective response rate, duration of response and PFS (all by investigator assessment) and safety. At data cutoff, 20 November 2023, median PFS by investigator assessment was 29.0 versus 7.2 months (hazard ratio (HR), 0.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.24–0.38), the 36-month PFS rate was 45.7% versus 12.4% and median OS was 52.6 versus 42.7 months (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56–0.94) with T-DXd versus T-DM1, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent with the previous analyses. No new instances of grade ≥3 interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis occurred (all grade rate, 16.7% (T-DXd) versus 3.4% (T-DM1)). With longer follow-up, T-DXd continued to demonstrate superior efficacy over T-DM1 with a manageable safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03529110.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
List of contributors:
Cortes, J.; Hurvitz, S. A.; Im, S. -A.; Iwata, H.; Curigliano, G.; Kim, S. -B.; Chiu, J. W. Y.; Pedrini, J. L.; Li, W.; Yonemori, K.; Bianchini, G.; Loi, S.; Borges, G. S.; Wang, X.; Bachelot, T.; Nakatani, S.; Ashfaque, S.; Liang, Z.; Egorov, A.; Hamilton, E.
Authors of the University:
BIANCHINI GIAMPAOLO
Handle:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/172578
Full Text:
https://iris.unisr.it//retrieve/handle/20.500.11768/172578/317335/unpaywall-bitstream--1986184470.pdf
Published in:
NATURE MEDICINE
Journal
  • Overview

Overview

URL

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03021-7
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.2.0