Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Reliability of paramagnetic rim lesion detection at 1.5T MRI in multiple sclerosis patients

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2025
Short description:
Reliability of paramagnetic rim lesion detection at 1.5T MRI in multiple sclerosis patients / Martire, M.S., Moiola, L., Maggi, P., Borrelli, S., Novati, V., Martinelli, V., Rocca, M.A., Vezzulli, P., Falini, A., Filippi, M., Absinta, M.. - In: MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS. - ISSN 1352-4585. - 31:8(2025), pp. 955-963. [10.1177/13524585251314358]
abstract:
Background: Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRL) are valuable for diagnosing and prognosing multiple sclerosis (MS) and detectable at 7T and 3T MRI. For translation into clinical practice, it is essential assessing their visibility on 1.5T clinical scanners. Objective: To evaluate the reliability of detecting PRL using commercially available susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) at 1.5 versus 3T MRI. Methods: SWI images were obtained in 20 people with MS at 1.5T and 3T MRI, with an average scan interval of 1.1 years. Only stable, non-enhancing lesions visible on both scans were analyzed. PRL at 3T were identified by two expert raters using NAIMS PRL criteria and used as a reference. Four raters, blinded to 3T results, assessed PRL at 1.5T. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Results: PRL were identified in 16 of 20 patients. At 3T, 95 PRL were identified by consensus (mean 5 PRL per patient, range 0–30). Blinded to 3T scans, 82% of PRL were visible at 1.5T (78 of 95 PRL). Interrater reliability was “almost perfect” for both 1.5 and 3T scans. Raters accurately classified all patients as having ⩾1PRL or not at 1.5T. Conclusion: The majority of PRL are detectable at 1.5T without significantly reducing the specificity of PRL identification or increasing the detection of pseudo-PRL. This may facilitate their clinical use in MS diagnosis and prognosis.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
List of contributors:
Martire, M. S.; Moiola, L.; Maggi, P.; Borrelli, S.; Novati, V.; Martinelli, V.; Rocca, M. A.; Vezzulli, P.; Falini, A.; Filippi, M.; Absinta, M.
Authors of the University:
FALINI ANDREA
FILIPPI MASSIMO
ROCCA MARIA ASSUNTA
Handle:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/179559
Published in:
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
Journal
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.9.0.0