Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Future Prospects of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Comprehensive Review

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2024
Short description:
Future Prospects of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Comprehensive Review / Hage, K., Perrotta, G., Betancourt, R.S., Danaf, J., Gajjar, A., Tomey, D., Marrero, K., Ghanem, O.M.. - In: HEALTHCARE. - ISSN 2227-9032. - 12:17(2024). [10.3390/healthcare12171707]
abstract:
Background: The field of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is currently an expanding surgical field with constant refinements in techniques, outcomes, indications, and objectives. MBS has been effectively applied across diverse patient demographics, including varying ages, genders, body mass indexes, and comorbidity statuses. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature review of published retrospective cohort studies, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and literature reviews from inception to 2024, reporting outcomes of MBS using databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Springer Link. Results: MBS is a safe and efficient therapeutic option for patients with obesity and associated medical conditions (mortality rate 0.03–0.2%; complication rates 0.4–1%). The favorable safety profile of MBS in the short-, mid-, and long-term offers the potential to treat patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus, immunosuppression, chronic anticoagulation, neoplastic disease, and end-organ failure without increased morbidity and mortality. Conclusions: In conclusion, the future of MBS lies in the ongoing innovation and adapted therapeutic strategies along with the integration of a variety of other techniques for managing obesity. Careful preoperative assessments, coupled with a multidisciplinary approach, remain essential to ensure optimal surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction after MBS.
Iris type:
1.1.1 Articolo in rivista - Review
List of contributors:
Hage, Karl; Perrotta, Gerardo; Betancourt, Richard S.; Danaf, Jamil; Gajjar, Aryan; Tomey, Daniel; Marrero, Katie; Ghanem, Omar M.
Handle:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/186083
Full Text:
https://iris.unisr.it//retrieve/handle/20.500.11768/186083/309259/healthcare-12-01707-v2.pdf
Published in:
HEALTHCARE
Journal
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.9.0.0