Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Phase III Trial of Pirtobrutinib Versus Idelalisib/Rituximab or Bendamustine/Rituximab in Covalent Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Pretreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (BRUIN CLL-321)

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2025
Short description:
Phase III Trial of Pirtobrutinib Versus Idelalisib/Rituximab or Bendamustine/Rituximab in Covalent Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Pretreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma (BRUIN CLL-321) / Sharman, J.P., Munir, T., Grosicki, S., Roeker, L.E., Burke, J.M., Chen, C.I., Grzasko, N., Follows, G., Matrai, Z., Sanna, A., Qiu, L., Feng, R., Hua, V.M., Jurczak, W., Ritgen, M., Yi, S., Bosch, F., Coombs, C.C., Bao, K., Patel, V., et al.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0732-183X. - 43:22(2025), pp. 2538-2549. [10.1200/JCO-25-00166]
abstract:
PURPOSEPirtobrutinib, a noncovalent, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), has shown clinical efficacy and a favorable safety profile. BRUIN CLL-321 was an open-label, randomized phase III study conducted exclusively in patients with R/R chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) previously treated with cBTKi, and compared pirtobrutinib with investigator's choice (IC) of idelalisib/rituximab (IdelaR) or bendamustine/rituximab (BR).METHODSPatients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pirtobrutinib (200 mg once daily) or IC of IdelaR or BR, and were stratified by previous use of venetoclax and del(17p). The primary end point was independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included time to next treatment or death (TTNT), overall survival (OS), and safety. The primary PFS end point was met at the time of the primary analysis (August 29, 2023), and updated results are reported from the final OS analysis (August 29, 2024).RESULTSA total of 238 patients were randomly assigned to receive pirtobrutinib (n = 119) or IC (n = 119; IdelaR [n = 82], BR [n = 37]). The PFS hazard ratio (HR) was 0.54 ([95% CI, 0.39 to 0.75]; P =.0002), with a median PFS of 14 months (95% CI, 11.2 to 16.6) in the pirtobrutinib group and 8.7 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 10.4) with IC. The unadjusted OS HR was 1.09 ([95% CI, 0.68 to 1.75]; P =.7202), and 18-month OS rate was 73.4% (95% CI, 63.9 to 80.7) in the pirtobrutinib group and 70.8% (95% CI, 60.9 to 78.7) with IC. Median TTNT was 24 months (95% CI, 17.8 to 29.7) with pirtobrutinib versus 10.9 months (95% CI, 8.7 to 12.5) with IC (HR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.52]). At a median follow-up of 17.2 months, grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were lower with pirtobrutinib (57.7%) than IC (73.4%). Treatment discontinuation due to AE occurred in 20 (17.2%) patients receiving pirtobrutinib and 38 (34.9%) patients receiving IC.CONCLUSIONPirtobrutinib improved PFS and TTNT, and demonstrated favorable tolerability, versus IdelaR/BR in exclusively cBTKi pretreated patients with CLL/SLL.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
List of contributors:
Sharman, J. P.; Munir, T.; Grosicki, S.; Roeker, L. E.; Burke, J. M.; Chen, C. I.; Grzasko, N.; Follows, G.; Matrai, Z.; Sanna, A.; Qiu, L.; Feng, R.; Hua, V. M.; Jurczak, W.; Ritgen, M.; Yi, S.; Bosch, F.; Coombs, C. C.; Bao, K.; Patel, V.; Liu, B.; Compte, L.; Guntur, A.; Wang, D. Y.; Hill, M.; Leow, C. C.; Ghia, P.; Barr, P. M.
Authors of the University:
GHIA PAOLO PROSPERO
Handle:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/186321
Full Text:
https://iris.unisr.it//retrieve/handle/20.500.11768/186321/329184/sharman-et-al-2025.pdf
Published in:
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Journal
  • Overview

Overview

URL

https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO-25-00166
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.6.1.0