Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Prevalence and Screening Tools of Intimate Partner Violence Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2025
Short description:
Prevalence and Screening Tools of Intimate Partner Violence Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis / Brunelli, L; Pennisi, F; Pinto, A; Cella, L; Parpinel, M; Brusaferro, S; Signorelli, C; Baldo, V; Gianfredi, V. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATION IN HEALTH, PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION.. - ISSN 2254-9625. - 15:8(2025). [10.3390/ejihpe15080161]
abstract:
(1) Background: Domestic violence (DV), including intimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy and the puerperium, represents a major public health issue, significantly affecting maternal and child health. (2) Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, aimed to identify screening tools used to detect DV and IPV among pregnant and postpartum women and to estimate DV prevalence. The protocol was published in PROSPERO in advance (CRD42023473392). (3) Results: A comprehensive literature search across PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted on 1 January 2024, resulting in 34,720 records; 98 studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies were conducted in over 40 countries, and most were cross-sectional. Commonly used screening tools included the WHO Women’s Health and Life Experiences Questionnaire, the Abuse Assessment Screen, and the WHO Violence Against Women Instrument. Meta-analyses showed that 10% of women experienced physical violence, 26% psychological violence, 9% sexual violence, 16% verbal violence, and 13% economic violence. The overall prevalence of IPV during pregnancy and the puerperium was 26%. Despite the widespread use of validated instruments, substantial heterogeneity was observed, underscoring the need for standardization. (4) Conclusion: These findings underline the urgent need to integrate routine IPV screening into maternal care pathways using validated, culturally adapted tools, ensuring women’s safety and confidentiality.
Iris type:
1.1.1 Articolo in rivista - Review
List of contributors:
Brunelli, L; Pennisi, F; Pinto, A; Cella, L; Parpinel, M; Brusaferro, S; Signorelli, C; Baldo, V; Gianfredi, V
Authors of the University:
PENNISI FLAVIA
SIGNORELLI CARLO
Handle:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/194319
Full Text:
https://iris.unisr.it//retrieve/handle/20.500.11768/194319/341210/ejihpe-15-00161.pdf
Published in:
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATION IN HEALTH, PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION.
Journal
  • Overview

Overview

URL

https://www.mdpi.com/2254-9625/15/8/161
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0