Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Disability and Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2024
Short description:
Disability and Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis / Ricciardi, G.e., Cuciniello, R., De Ponti, E., Lunetti, C., Pennisi, F., Signorelli, C., Renzi, C.. - In: CURRENT ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 1198-0052. - 31:11(2024), pp. 7023-7039. [10.3390/curroncol31110517]
abstract:
Background: The aim of this study is to assess the impact of disability on participation in CRC screening and to determine the overall effect size. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare CRC screening participation in individuals with and without disabilities. The search encompassed five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, medRxiv). Pooled estimates were calculated for each type of CRC screening and disability categories to synthesize the findings. The participation in CRC screening was derived using a random effects model. Results: A total of 20 articles were included, most of them from the USA. Based on pooled estimates, individuals with disabilities have lower odds of undergoing CRC screening versus those without disabilities (OR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.73–0.87). Analysis by screening type indicated that individuals with a disability have lower odds of a fecal occult blood test or a fecal immunochemical test (OR: 0.72, 95%CI 0.65–0.81), with no significant difference for a colonoscopy. Individuals with intellectual disabilities had significantly lower rates of CRC screening participation (OR = 0.65, 95%CI 0.53–0.79), especially for FOBT/FIT (OR = 0.58, 95%CI 0.49–0.69). Conclusions: Disparities exist for CRC screening participation in people with disabilities. Further research and coordinated efforts are essential to develop interventions for improving early cancer diagnosis for this non-negligible patient group.
Iris type:
1.1.1 Articolo in rivista - Review
List of contributors:
Ricciardi, Ge; Cuciniello, R; De Ponti, E; Lunetti, C; Pennisi, F; Signorelli, C; Renzi, C
Authors of the University:
PENNISI FLAVIA
RENZI CRISTINA
SIGNORELLI CARLO
Handle:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/194325
Full Text:
https://iris.unisr.it//retrieve/handle/20.500.11768/194325/339081/curroncol-31-00517-v2.pdf
Published in:
CURRENT ONCOLOGY
Journal
  • Overview

Overview

URL

https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/31/11/517
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.7.2.0