Constitutional copy number amplifications: rare or under-evaluated? Revisiting a 25-year-old cold case

We reanalyzed through a cytogenomics approach a case published 20 years ago, describing a girl with developmental delay and epilepsy. Karyotype and FISH analysis showed a de novo 2.3 Mb terminal inverted-duplication at 8q24.3. The interpretation was inconsistent with the absence of a more distal deletion as expected for distal inverted duplications, and it was inconceivable to highlight rearrangements smaller than 5–10 Mb at that time. Chromosomal microarray (CMA), optical genome mapping (OGM), and short-read whole genome sequencing (srWGS) identified a complex configuration at 8q24.3, which resembles events like chromoanasynthesis or DUP-TRP/INV-DUP (duplication-triplication/inverted-duplication), both characterized by clustered duplications and triplications, some of which are inverted. In the EBV-line genes located in the amplified regions were overexpressed. Despite a more precise definition of the imbalance, we were unable to provide a clear-cut explanation for the proband’s clinical features.