Publication Date:
2016
abstract:
Following its modern meaning, “catastrophe” indicates the turning point of a narrative, that leads to an epilogue or that suddenly decides the outcome. Thus “catastrophe”, does not
merely mean an absolute end, but rather a shape-shifting, a readjustment, what irreversibly is
changing toward something that is still unknown. Describing the collapse of an order, its end, the catastrophe thematizes the causes of the collapse of that order with the intellectual search for a new order, a new continuity. Hence, it represents a theoretical challenge for philosophy, whose attempts to understand and philosophically “use” the catastrophe are dealt in this essay, focusing especially on Plato, Diderot, Rousseau, Kant.
merely mean an absolute end, but rather a shape-shifting, a readjustment, what irreversibly is
changing toward something that is still unknown. Describing the collapse of an order, its end, the catastrophe thematizes the causes of the collapse of that order with the intellectual search for a new order, a new continuity. Hence, it represents a theoretical challenge for philosophy, whose attempts to understand and philosophically “use” the catastrophe are dealt in this essay, focusing especially on Plato, Diderot, Rousseau, Kant.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
catastrofe; evento; antropodicea
List of contributors:
Tagliapietra, Andrea
Published in: