Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Impact of Response to Prior Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving Second-Line Therapy: Implications for Trial Design

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2013
Short description:
Impact of Response to Prior Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving Second-Line Therapy: Implications for Trial Design / Pond, Gr; Bellmunt, J; Fougeray, R; Choueiri, Tk; Qu, Aq; Niegisch, G; Albers, P; Di Lorenzo, G; Salhi, Y; Galsky, Md; Agarwal, N; Necchi, A; Sonpavde, G. - In: CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER. - ISSN 1558-7673. - 11:4(2013), pp. 495-500. [10.1016/j.clgc.2013.04.025]
abstract:
In a retrospective analysis of pooled phase II trials, best prior response in patients receiving prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease did not confer an independent prognostic impact with second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Background: The prognostic impact of response to prior chemotherapy independent of performance status (PS), hemoglobin (Hb), liver metastasis (LM), and time from prior chemotherapy (TFPC) in the context of second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) is unknown. Methods: Six phase II trials evaluating second-line therapy (n = 504) were pooled. Patients who received prior therapy for metastatic disease were eligible for analysis if Hb, LM, PS, and TFPC were available. Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.0 to first-line therapy was recorded. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the date of registration using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 275 patients were evaluable for analysis. Patients received gemcitabine-paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide-paclitaxel, pazopanib, docetaxel plus vandetanib/placebo, or vinflunine (2 trials). Those with prior response (n = 111) had a median OS of 8.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.8-9.4), compared with 5.9 months (95% CI, 5.0-6.6) for those without prior response (n = 164). Those with prior response had a median PFS of 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.6-4.0) compared with 2.6 months (95% CI, 2.0-2.8) in patients without response. Multivariable analysis did not reveal a significant independent impact of prior response on PFS and OS. Conclusions: Best prior response in patients receiving prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease did not confer an independent prognostic impact with second-line therapy for advanced UC. Given that the setting of prior chemotherapy (metastatic or perioperative) has not appeared significant in a prior study, patients who received prior chemotherapy in perioperative or metastatic settings may be enrolled in the same second-line trial stratified for PS, Hb, LM, and TFPC.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
List of contributors:
Pond, Gr; Bellmunt, J; Fougeray, R; Choueiri, Tk; Qu, Aq; Niegisch, G; Albers, P; Di Lorenzo, G; Salhi, Y; Galsky, Md; Agarwal, N; Necchi, A; Sonpavde, G
Authors of the University:
NECCHI ANDREA
Handle:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/105829
Published in:
CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER
Journal
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0