Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

The Relationship between Characteristics of Inguinal Lymph Nodes and Pelvic Lymph Node Involvement in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single Institution Experience

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2014
Short description:
The Relationship between Characteristics of Inguinal Lymph Nodes and Pelvic Lymph Node Involvement in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single Institution Experience / Lughezzani, G., Catanzaro, M., Torelli, T., Piva, L., Biasoni, D., Stagni, S., Crestani, A., Guttilla, A., Raggi, D., Giannatempo, P., Necchi, A., Pizzocaro, G., Colecchia, M., Salvioni, R., Nicolai, N.. - In: THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY. - ISSN 0022-5347. - 191:4(2014), pp. 977-982. [10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.140]
abstract:
Purpose: We determined predictors of pelvic lymph node metastases in patients with penile cancer. Materials and Methods: We retrieved a total of 188 node positive inguinal groins from 142 patients treated for penile cancer. Logistic regression models were fitted to test for predictors of pelvic lymph node metastases. The minimum p value method was used to determine the most significant cutoff values of each predictor. Results: Pelvic lymph node metastases were observed in 45 cases (31.7%). The 5-year cancer specific survival rate was 71.0% vs 33.2% in patients with inguinal vs pelvic lymph node metastases. The most significant cutoff values were 3 inguinal lymph node metastases and a metastasis diameter of 30 mm. According to univariable logistic regression models the number of inguinal metastases (OR 1.92, p <0.001), the diameter of the metastases (OR 1.03, p = 0.001) and extranodal extension (OR 8.01, p <0.001) were significant predictors of pelvic lymph node metastases. These variables were also independent predictors of metastases in multivariable logistic regression models (p <= 0.012). Patients with 3 or more inguinal lymph node metastases and those with a metastasis diameter of 30 mm or greater were at 4.77 and 2.53-fold higher risk, respectively, of harboring pelvic lymph node metastases (p <= 0.006). The proportion of metastases increased significantly from 0% in cases with no risk factors to 57.1% when all 3 risk factors were observed (p <0.001). Conclusions: The number and diameter of inguinal lymph node metastases as well as extranodal extension are significantly associated with pelvic lymph node metastases. These variables should be considered to determine the need for pelvic lymph node dissection. Patients with no risk factors may be spared this dissection.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
List of contributors:
Lughezzani, G; Catanzaro, M; Torelli, T; Piva, L; Biasoni, D; Stagni, S; Crestani, A; Guttilla, A; Raggi, D; Giannatempo, P; Necchi, A; Pizzocaro, G; Colecchia, M; Salvioni, R; Nicolai, N
Authors of the University:
COLECCHIA MAURIZIO
NECCHI ANDREA
Handle:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/105878
Published in:
THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Journal
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.7.2.0