Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca
  1. Pubblicazioni

Same-session double EUS-guided bypass versus surgical gastroenterostomy and hepaticojejunostomy: an international multicenter comparison

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2023
Citazione:
Same-session double EUS-guided bypass versus surgical gastroenterostomy and hepaticojejunostomy: an international multicenter comparison / Bronswijk, M.; Vanella, G.; Van Wanrooij, R. L. J.; Samanta, J.; Lauwereys, J.; Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles, E.; Dell'Anna, G.; Dhar, J.; Gupta, V.; Van Malenstein, H.; Laleman, W.; Jaekers, J.; Topal, H.; Topal, B.; Crippa, S.; Falconi, M.; Besselink, M. G.; Messaoudi, N.; Arcidiacono, P. G.; Kunda, R.; Van Der Merwe, S.. - In: GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY. - ISSN 0016-5107. - 98:2(2023), pp. 225-236. [Epub ahead of print] [10.1016/j.gie.2023.03.019]
Abstract:
Background and aims: Gastric outlet and biliary obstruction are common manifestations of GI malignancies and some benign diseases for which standard treatment would be surgical gastroenterostomy and hepaticojejunostomy (ie, "double bypass"). Therapeutic EUS has allowed for the creation of an EUS-guided double bypass. However, same-session double EUS-guided bypass has only been described in small proof-of-concept series and lacks a comparison with surgical double bypass. Methods: A retrospective multicenter analysis was performed of all consecutive same-session double EUS-guided bypass procedures performed in 5 academic centers. Surgical comparators were extracted from these centers' databases from the same time interval. Efficacy, safety, hospital stay, nutrition and chemotherapy resumption, long-term patency, and survival were compared. Results: Of 154 identified patients, 53 (34.4%) received treatment with EUS and 101 (65.6%) with surgery. At baseline, patients undergoing EUS exhibited higher American Society of Anesthesiologists scores and a higher median Charlson Comorbidity Index (9.0 [interquartile range {IQR}, 7.0-10.0] vs 7.0 [IQR, 5.0-9.0], P < .001). Technical success (96.2% vs 100%, P = .117) and clinical success rates (90.6% vs 82.2%, P = .234) were similar when comparing EUS and surgery. Overall (11.3% vs 34.7%, P = .002) and severe adverse events (3.8% vs 19.8%, P = .007) occurred more frequently in the surgical group. In the EUS group, median time to oral intake (0 days [IQR, 0-1] vs 6 days [IQR, 3-7], P < .001) and hospital stay (4.0 days [IQR, 3-9] vs 13 days [IQR, 9-22], P < .001) were significantly shorter. Conclusions: Despite being used in a patient population with more comorbidities, same-session double EUS-guided bypass achieved similar technical and clinical success and was associated with fewer overall and severe adverse events when compared with surgical gastroenterostomy and hepaticojejunostomy.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Elenco autori:
Bronswijk, M.; Vanella, G.; Van Wanrooij, R. L. J.; Samanta, J.; Lauwereys, J.; Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles, E.; Dell'Anna, G.; Dhar, J.; Gupta, V.; Van Malenstein, H.; Laleman, W.; Jaekers, J.; Topal, H.; Topal, B.; Crippa, S.; Falconi, M.; Besselink, M. G.; Messaoudi, N.; Arcidiacono, P. G.; Kunda, R.; Van Der Merwe, S.
Autori di Ateneo:
ARCIDIACONO PAOLO GIORGIO
CRIPPA STEFANO
FALCONI MASSIMO
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/147536
Pubblicato in:
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Journal
  • Dati Generali

Dati Generali

URL

https://www.giejournal.org/article/S0016-5107(23)00359-0/fulltext
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.0.0