Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca
  1. Pubblicazioni

International Multicenter Validation Study of the SAGIT® Instrument in Acromegaly

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2021
Citazione:
International Multicenter Validation Study of the SAGIT® Instrument in Acromegaly / Giustina, Andrea; Bronstein, Marcello D; Chanson, Philippe; Petersenn, Stephan; Casanueva, Felipe F; Sert, Caroline; Houchard, Aude; Melmed, Shlomo. - In: THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM. - ISSN 0021-972X. - 106:12(2021), pp. 3555-3568. [10.1210/clinem/dgab536]
Abstract:
Context: The SAGIT (R) instrument (SAGIT) has been developed to enable accurate characterization of acromegaly disease activity.Objective: We evaluated the ability of SAGIT to discriminate acromegaly disease control status.Methods: This multicenter, noninterventional, prospective and retrospective, longitudinal study, conducted at academic and private clinical practice sites, included patients aged >= 18 years with a diagnosis of controlled (n = 109) or non-controlled (n = 105) acromegaly, assessed by clinical global evaluation of disease control (CGE-DC) questionnaire, investigator therapeutic decision, and international guidelines. Control status was not determined at baseline for 13 patients. Since 9 patients were enrolled retrospectively, all presented analyses are based on the prospective population (N = 227). Patients were assessed over a 2-year follow-up period. Classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were performed to investigate how SAGIT components at baseline (signs/symptoms [S], associated comorbidities [A], growth hormone levels [G], insulin-like growth factor 1 levels [II, tumor features [T]) discriminate between controlled and non-controlled acromegaly.Results: Baseline mean subscores S, G, I, andT were significantly lower in patients with CGE-DC controlled vs CGE-DC non-controlled acromegaly. SAGIT components I and G for CGE-DC and S, A, G, I, andT for the clinician's therapeutic decision were retained by CART analyses. For international guidelines, only SAGIT component I was retained.The risk for undergoing >= 1 treatment change during the study was 3.44 times greater for CGE-DC non-controlled acromegaly relative to CGE-DC controlled acromegaly.Conclusion: The SAGIT instrument is a valid and sensitive tool to comprehensively and accurately assess acromegaly severity.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Elenco autori:
Giustina, Andrea; Bronstein, Marcello D; Chanson, Philippe; Petersenn, Stephan; Casanueva, Felipe F; Sert, Caroline; Houchard, Aude; Melmed, Shlomo
Autori di Ateneo:
GIUSTINA ANDREA
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/148439
Link al Full Text:
https://iris.unisr.it//retrieve/handle/20.500.11768/148439/161706/dgab536.pdf
Pubblicato in:
THE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM
Journal
  • Dati Generali

Dati Generali

URL

https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/106/12/3555/6328804?login=true
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0