Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca
  1. Pubblicazioni

Could double stain for p53/CK20 be a useful diagnostic tool for the appropriate classification of flat urothelial lesions?

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2022
Citazione:
Could double stain for p53/CK20 be a useful diagnostic tool for the appropriate classification of flat urothelial lesions? / Di Sciascio, L.; Ambrosi, F.; Franceschini, T.; Giunchi, F.; Franchini, E.; Massari, F.; Bianchi, F. M.; Colecchia, M.; Fiorentino, M.; Ricci, C.. - In: PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE. - ISSN 0344-0338. - 234:(2022). [10.1016/j.prp.2022.153937]
Abstract:
Background: The differential diagnosis between flat urothelial lesions [reactive urothelial atypia (RUA), atypia of unknown significance (AUS), urothelial dysplasia (UD) and carcinoma in situ (CIS)] has relevant prognostic and therapeutic implications. This crucial distinction could be very challenging but it is currently performed on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides, with a great amount of partially discordant and/or not conclusive findings of the potential adjunctive role of immunohistochemistry. Herein, we tested double staining (DS) for p53/CK20 to verify if p53(+) cells, CK20(+) cells and double-positive cells (DPCs) are differentially expressed among these lesions and if p53/CK20 could be a useful tool in this diagnostic setting. Methods: We tested 50, 9, 36 and 29 consecutive and retrospectively enrolled cases of RUA, AUS, UD and CIS, respectively. p53(+) cells, CK20(+) cells and DPCs were evaluated and compared by adopting the appropriate statistic tests (Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests). Results: We found that p53(+) cells (p = 0.000), CK20(+) cells (p = 0.000) and DPCs (p = 0.000) showed statistically significant differences among the different flat urothelial lesions. Besides, when dichotomized, both CIS and RUA are easily differentiable from their histological mimickers adopting all these markers; by contrast, AUS and UD did not reach statistically significant differences able to differentiate them from each other [p53(+) cells, p = 0.123; CK20(+) cells, p = 0.567; DPCs, p = 0.409], except if compared to CIS [AUS VS CIS: p53(+) cells, p = 0.013; CK20(+) cells, p = 0.000; DPCs, p = 0.000; UD vs CIS: p53(+) cells, p = 0.000; CK20(+) cells, p = 0.000; DPCs, p = 0.000]. Conclusions: p53(+) cells, CK20(+) cells and DPCs are differently expressed by flat urothelial lesions and p53/CK20 could be a time- and money-saving tool for the appropriate management of these lesions if applied to a routine scenario.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Elenco autori:
Di Sciascio, L.; Ambrosi, F.; Franceschini, T.; Giunchi, F.; Franchini, E.; Massari, F.; Bianchi, F. M.; Colecchia, M.; Fiorentino, M.; Ricci, C.
Autori di Ateneo:
COLECCHIA MAURIZIO
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/152864
Pubblicato in:
PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
Journal
  • Dati Generali

Dati Generali

URL

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0344033822001819?via=ihub
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0