Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

First world consensus conference on pancreas transplantation: Part I—Methods and results of literature search

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2021
Short description:
First world consensus conference on pancreas transplantation: Part I—Methods and results of literature search / Boggi, U., Vistoli, F., Marchetti, P., Kandaswamy, R., Berney, T., Andres, A., Arbogast, H.P., Badet, L., Baronti, W., Bartlett, S.T., Benedetti, E., Branchereau, J., Burke, G.W.3., Buron, F., Caldara, R., Cardillo, M., Casanova, D., Cipriani, F., Cooper, M., Cupisti, A., et al.. - In: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION. - ISSN 1600-6135. - 21:3(2021), pp. 1-16. [10.1111/ajt.16738]
abstract:
Comprehensive evidence-based guidelines for the practice of pancreas transplantation are yet to be established. The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation was convened for this purpose. A steering committee selected the participants and defined the questions to be addressed. A group of literature reviewers identified 597 studies to be included in summaries for guidelines production. Expert groups formulated the first draft of recommendations. Two rounds of discussion and voting occurred online, using the Delphi method (agreement rate ≥85%). After each round, critical responses of experts were reviewed, and recommendations were amended accordingly. Recommendations were finalized after live discussions. Each session was preceded by expert presentations and a summary of results of systematic literature review. Up to three voting rounds were allowed for each recommendation. To avoid potential conflicts of interest, deliberations on issues regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the management of diabetes were conducted by an independent jury. Recommendations on technical issues were determined by experts and validated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology. Each recommendation received a GRADE rating (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations).
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
List of contributors:
Boggi, U.; Vistoli, F.; Marchetti, P.; Kandaswamy, R.; Berney, T.; Andres, A.; Arbogast, H. P.; Badet, L.; Baronti, W.; Bartlett, S. T.; Benedetti, E.; Branchereau, J.; Burke, G. W. 3.; Buron, F.; Caldara, R.; Cardillo, M.; Casanova, D.; Cipriani, F.; Cooper, M.; Cupisti, A.; De Koning, E. J. P.; Davide, J.; Drachenberg, C.; Ettorre, G. M.; Fernandez Cruz, L.; Fridell, J. A.; Friend, P. J.; Furian, L.; Gaber, O. A.; Gruessner, A. C.; Gruessner, R. W. G.; Gunton, J. E.; Han, D. -J.; Iacopi, S.; Kauffmann, E. F.; Kaufman, D.; Kenmochi, T.; Khambalia, H. A.; Lai, Q.; Langer, R. M.; Maffi, P.; Marselli, L.; Menichetti, F.; Miccoli, M.; Mittal, S.; Morelon, E.; Napoli, N.; Neri, F.; Oberholzer, J.; Odorico, J. S.; Ollinger, R.; Oniscu, G.; Orlando, G.; Ortenzi, M.; Perosa, M.; Perrone, V. G.; Redfield, R. R.; Ricci, C.; Rigotti, P.; Robertson, R. P.; Ross, L. F.; Rossi, M.; Saudek, F.; Scalea, J. R.; Schenker, P.; Secchi, A.; Socci, C.; Sousa Silva, D.; Squifflet, J. P.; Stock, P. G.; Stratta, R. J.; Terrenzio, C.; Uva, P.; Watson, C. C. E.; White, S. A.
Authors of the University:
CIPRIANI FEDERICA
MAFFI PAOLA ANGELA MARIA
RIGOTTI PAOLO
Handle:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/156947
Full Text:
https://iris.unisr.it//retrieve/handle/20.500.11768/156947/200705/1-s2.0-S1600613522088797-main.pdf
Published in:
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Journal
  • Overview

Overview

URL

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1600613522088797?via=ihub
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.9.0.0