Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca
  1. Pubblicazioni

Stepwise provisional versus systematic culotte for stenting of true coronary bifurcation lesions: five-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised EBC TWO Trial

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2023
Citazione:
Stepwise provisional versus systematic culotte for stenting of true coronary bifurcation lesions: five-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised EBC TWO Trial / Arunothayaraj, S.; Behan, M. W.; Lefevre, T.; Lassen, J. F.; Chieffo, A.; Stankovic, G.; Burzotta, F.; Pan, M.; Ferenc, M.; Hovasse, T.; Spence, M. S.; Brunel, P.; Cotton, J. M.; Cockburn, J.; Carrie, D.; Baumbach, A.; Maeng, M.; Louvard, Y.; Hildick-Smith, D.. - In: EUROINTERVENTION. - ISSN 1774-024X. - 19:4(2023), pp. E297-E304. [10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00211]
Abstract:
Background: The multicentre European Bifurcation Club Trial (EBC TWO) showed no significant differences in 12-month clinical outcomes between patients randomised to a provisional stenting strategy or systematic culotte stenting in non-left main true bifurcations. Aims: This study aimed to investigate the 5-year clinical results of the EBC TWO Trial. Methods: A total of 200 patients undergoing stent implantation for non-left main bifurcation lesions were recruited into EBC TWO. Inclusion criteria required a side branch diameter ≥2.5 mm and side branch lesion length >5 mm. Five-year follow-up was completed for 197 patients. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularisation. Results: The mean side branch stent diameter was 2.7±0.3 mm and mean side branch lesion length was 10.3±7.2 mm. At 5-year follow-up, the primary endpoint occurred in 18.4% of provisional and 23.7% of systematic culotte patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-1.38). No significant differences were identified individually for all-cause mortality (7.8% vs 7.2%, HR 1.11, 95% CI: 0.40-3.05), myocardial infarction (8.7% vs 13.4%, HR 0.64, 95% CI: 0.27-1.50) or target vessel revascularisation (6.8% vs 9.3%, HR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.37-3.34). Stent thrombosis rates were also similar (1.9% vs 3.1%, HR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.11-3.75). There was no significant interaction between the extent of side branch disease and the primary outcome (p=0.34). Conclusions: In large non-left main true bifurcation lesions, the use of a systematic culotte strategy showed no benefit over provisional stenting for the composite outcome of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularisation at 5 years. The stepwise provisional approach may be considered preferable for the majority of true coronary bifurcation lesions.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
ACS/NSTE-ACS; bifurcation; drug-eluting stent; stable angina
Elenco autori:
Arunothayaraj, S.; Behan, M. W.; Lefevre, T.; Lassen, J. F.; Chieffo, A.; Stankovic, G.; Burzotta, F.; Pan, M.; Ferenc, M.; Hovasse, T.; Spence, M. S.; Brunel, P.; Cotton, J. M.; Cockburn, J.; Carrie, D.; Baumbach, A.; Maeng, M.; Louvard, Y.; Hildick-Smith, D.
Autori di Ateneo:
CHIEFFO ALAIDE
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/198777
Pubblicato in:
EUROINTERVENTION
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0