Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca
  1. Pubblicazioni

Bridging the gap in bloodstream infection management: A survey among non-infectious disease physicians

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2025
Citazione:
Bridging the gap in bloodstream infection management: A survey among non-infectious disease physicians / Mori, G.; Zandonà, E.; Campomori, A.; Scarparo, C.; Urru, S. A.; Stevanin, G.; Lorenzin, G.; Ripa, M.; Castelli, A.; Prezzavento, A.; Carli, A.; Lombardo, C.; Lanzafame, M.. - In: JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE. - ISSN 2632-1823. - 7:5(2025). [10.1093/jacamr/dlaf160]
Abstract:
Objective Bloodstream infections (BSIs) significantly impact morbidity and mortality. Despite emerging evidence supporting optimal management, substantial variability persists among non-infectious disease (ID) physicians. This study assessed non-ID physicians' knowledge and attitudes in BSI management, identifying critical gaps to inform antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions.Methods In December 2024, we conducted an online questionnaire among non-ID physicians at the Provincial Health Care Agency, Trento, Italy. An 18-item questionnaire, developed by a multidisciplinary group, evaluated key domains of BSI management, including diagnostic strategies, antibiotic selection, treatment duration, follow-up management, and ID consultation practices. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse response patterns.Results Of 128 respondents, 99% expressed willingness to follow internal BSI guidelines, and 94% supported multidisciplinary feedback. Overall, 50.8% correctly identified the optimal 14-day antibiotic duration for uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB), and 67.2% selected appropriate treatment for MSSA infections. The prevalence of complicated SAB was underestimated by 51.6% of participants. Follow-up blood cultures and echocardiography were variably recommended (40.6% and 71.9%, respectively, for SAB). 50.8% correctly indicated a 7-day therapy for uncomplicated Gram-negative BSIs, and 49.2% appropriately chose first-line treatments for susceptible Enterobacterales. Familiarity with antibiotic de-escalation (86.7%) and IV-to-oral therapy (94.5%) was high, but appropriate application knowledge was inconsistent. Penicillin safety in reported low-risk allergies was recognized by 63.3%, and carbapenems as alternatives by 46.1%.Conclusions These findings highlights substantial knowledge gaps among non-ID physicians regarding bacterial BSI management. These findings support targeted AMS interventions under the Bacteraemia Evidence-based Active Treatment (BEAT) initiative to improve clinical outcomes.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Elenco autori:
Mori, G.; Zandonà, E.; Campomori, A.; Scarparo, C.; Urru, S. A.; Stevanin, G.; Lorenzin, G.; Ripa, M.; Castelli, A.; Prezzavento, A.; Carli, A.; Lombardo, C.; Lanzafame, M.
Autori di Ateneo:
RIPA MARCO
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/191357
Link al Full Text:
https://iris.unisr.it//retrieve/handle/20.500.11768/191357/347272/dlaf160.pdf
Pubblicato in:
JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE
Journal
  • Dati Generali

Dati Generali

URL

https://academic.oup.com/jacamr/article/7/5/dlaf160/8251359?login=true
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.2.0