Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Frequency, characteristics and risk assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension with a left heart disease phenotype

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2025
Short description:
Frequency, characteristics and risk assessment of pulmonary arterial hypertension with a left heart disease phenotype / Toma, Matteo; Savonitto, Giulio; Lombardi, Carlo Maria; Airò, Edoardo; Driussi, Mauro; Gentile, Piero; Howard, Luke; Moschella, Martina; Di Poi, Emma; Pagnesi, Matteo; Monti, Simonetta; Collini, Valentino; D'Angelo, Luciana; Vecchiato, Veronica; Giannoni, Alberto; Adamo, Marianna; Barbisan, Davide; Bauleo, Carolina; Garascia, Andrea; Metra, Marco; Sinagra, Gianfranco; Giudice, Francesco Lo; Stolfo, Davide; Ameri, Pietro. - In: CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY. - ISSN 1861-0684. - 114:2(2025), pp. 215-226. [10.1007/s00392-024-02448-9]
abstract:
Aim: To obtain real-world evidence about the features and risk stratification of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with a left heart disease (LHD) phenotype (PAH-LHD). Methods and results: By reviewing the records of consecutive incident PAH patients at 7 tertiary centers from 2001 to 2021, we selected 286 subjects with all parameters needed to determine risk of death at baseline and at first follow-up with COMPERA and COMPERA 2.0 scores. Fifty seven (20%) had PAH-LHD according to the AMBITION definition. Compared with no-LHD ones, they were older, had higher BMI, more cardiovascular comorbidities, higher E/e’ ratio and left atrial area, but lower BNP concentrations and better right ventricular function and pulmonary hemodynamics. Survival was comparable between PAH-LHD and no-LHD patients, although the former were less commonly treated with dual PAH therapy. Both COMPERA and COMPERA 2.0 discriminated all-cause mortality risk of PAH-LHD at follow-up, but not at baseline. Risk profile significantly improved during follow-up only when assessed by COMPERA 2.0. At multivariable analysis with low-risk status as reference, intermediate-high and high-risk, but not LHD phenotype, were associated with higher hazard of all-cause mortality. Results were comparable in secondary analyses including patients in the last 10 years and atrial fibrillation and echocardiographic abnormalities as additional criteria for PAH-LHD. Conclusions: In real life, PAH-LHD patients are frequent, have less severe disease and are less likely treated with PAH drug combinations than no-LHD. The COMPERA 2.0 model may be more appropriate to evaluate their mortality risk during follow-up and how it is modulated by therapy.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
List of contributors:
Toma, Matteo; Savonitto, Giulio; Lombardi, Carlo Maria; Airò, Edoardo; Driussi, Mauro; Gentile, Piero; Howard, Luke; Moschella, Martina; Di Poi, Emma; Pagnesi, Matteo; Monti, Simonetta; Collini, Valentino; D'Angelo, Luciana; Vecchiato, Veronica; Giannoni, Alberto; Adamo, Marianna; Barbisan, Davide; Bauleo, Carolina; Garascia, Andrea; Metra, Marco; Sinagra, Gianfranco; Giudice, Francesco Lo; Stolfo, Davide; Ameri, Pietro
Authors of the University:
METRA MARCO
Handle:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/192896
Full Text:
https://iris.unisr.it//retrieve/handle/20.500.11768/192896/339535/unpaywall-bitstream--1898797170.pdf
Published in:
CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
Journal
  • Overview

Overview

URL

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00392-024-02448-9
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0