Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Monotherapy vs. combination therapy for Enterococcus faecalis bacteraemia: a target trial emulation

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2026
Short description:
Monotherapy vs. combination therapy for Enterococcus faecalis bacteraemia: a target trial emulation / Bartoletti, M., Rosselli Del Turco, E., Bussini, L., Paul, M., Sabik, E.F., Castagna, A., Ripa, M., Gomes, M.Z.R., Di Bella, S., Malosso, M., Lopez, A.B., Franceschini, E., Bandera, A., Barbieri, V., Oliva, A., Munoz, P., Mularoni, A., Seminari, E., Morelli, P., Tascini, C., et al.. - In: CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION. - ISSN 1198-743X. - 32:6(2026), pp. 983-990. [10.1016/j.cmi.2026.03.018]
abstract:
Objectives Optimal treatment for Enterococcus faecalis bloodstream infection (EF-BSI) remains a topic of debate. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of combination therapy compared with monotherapy in patients with EF-BSI and no endocarditis. Methods This was a target trial emulation based on a prospective, multicentre, international dataset collected in 24 international centres from January 2019 to December 2024. We included all adult patients with monomicrobial EF-BSI with negative echocardiography within 7 days from BSI onset. Exclusion criteria were diagnosis of endocarditis, not receiving or completed the therapy at randomization. Primary endpoint was clinical failure defined as a composite of death, relapse of EF-BSI, and diagnosis of endocarditis, at 90 days. Results Overall, 373 patients were eligible for inclusion, 267 of whom (71%) received monotherapy, mainly ampicillin (174 of 267, 65%); most prescribed combination regimens were ampicillin with either ceftriaxone or gentamicin (80 of 106, 75%). The composite clinical failure was met by 114 of 373 (31%) patients. The outcomes among patients who received monotherapy or combination treatment were 75 of 267 (28%) versus 39 of 106 (36%); p 0.185, leading to an overall risk difference in favour of monotherapy of 2% (95% CI, −10% to 15%). Sepsis or septic shock at the time of presentation was the only independent variables associated with clinical failure, after performing a weighted univariable and multivariable Cox regression model (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.52–1.39). Conclusions With the limitation of our sample size and observational design, we were not able to observe a better outcome associated with combination treatment for EF-BSI. If confirmed, these results would promote therapeutic simplification according to antimicrobial stewardship principles.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
List of contributors:
Bartoletti, Michele; Rosselli Del Turco, Elena; Bussini, Linda; Paul, Mical; Sabik, Eman Fares; Castagna, Antonella; Ripa, Marco; Gomes, Marisa Z. R.; Di Bella, Stefano; Malosso, Marta; Lopez, Alicia Beteta; Franceschini, Erica; Bandera, Alessandra; Barbieri, Viviana; Oliva, Alessandra; Munoz, Patricia; Mularoni, Alessandra; Seminari, Elena; Morelli, Paola; Tascini, Carlo; Papadimitriou-Olivgeris, Matthaios; Coppola, Nicola; Cristini, Francesco; Russo, Alessandro; Bassetti, Matteo; Travi, Giovanna; Lopez Contreras, Joaquin; Varisco, Benedetta; Viale, Pierluigi; Cento, Valeria; Gaibani, Paolo; Bavaro, Davide Fiore; Giannella, Maddalena; Merli, Marco
Authors of the University:
CASTAGNA ANTONELLA
RIPA MARCO
Handle:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/204377
Full Text:
https://iris.unisr.it//retrieve/handle/20.500.11768/204377/371059/1-s2.0-S1198743X26001369-main.pdf
Published in:
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Journal
  • Overview

Overview

URL

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1198743X26001369?via=ihub
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.9.2.0