Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • People
  • Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Expertise & Skills
  1. Outputs

Should We Still Have Bare-Metal Stents Available in Our Catheterization Laboratory?

Academic Article
Publication Date:
2017
abstract:
The introduction of bare-metal stents (BMS) has represented a major advancement over plain old balloon angioplasty in the management of coronary artery disease. However, the high rates of target lesion revascularization associated with use of BMS have led to the development of drug-eluting stents, which require prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy due to the increased risk of late and very late stent thrombosis. The improvements in newer-generation drug-eluting stents have translated into better safety and efficacy compared with earlier generation and BMS, thus allowing shorter dual antiplatelet therapy duration. Here, we aim to provide reasons as to why we still need BMS in our cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Iris type:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
drug-eluting stent; dual antiplatelet therapy; high bleeding risk patients; in-stent restenosis; stent thrombogenicity; stent thrombosis; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Stents; Cardiac Catheterization; Laboratories, Hospital; Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
List of contributors:
Colombo, Antonio; Giannini, Francesco; Briguori, Carlo
Handle:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/65832
Published in:
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Journal
  • Use of cookies

Powered by VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0