Data di Pubblicazione:
2019
Abstract:
The Cochrane library first published a meta-analysis in 2000 on the role of the episiotomy in modern clinical practice, which concluded that only a policy of selective episiotomy is acceptable with evidence-based improvement in maternal health compared with routine episiotomy. Many years later, however, the new version of the Cochrane meta-analysis changed the previous recommendations in that the selective use of episiotomy could not be considered beneficial in all cases. A selective policy is associated with a statistically significant reduction in severe perineal and/or vaginal trauma, whereas routine episiotomy seems to protect against these complications only after instrumental deliveries. Both in the short and the long term, selective medio-lateral episiotomy has no additional beneficial effects without clear evidence of causing harm to the mother or baby.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1.1 Articolo in rivista - Review
Keywords:
Anal incontinence; Episiotomy; Pelvic floor dysfunction; Urinary incontinence; Vaginal delivery; Delivery, Obstetric; Episiotomy; Female; Humans; Lacerations; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Pelvic Floor Disorders; Perineum; Pregnancy
Elenco autori:
Serati, M.; Salvatore, S.; Rizk, D.
Link alla scheda completa:
Pubblicato in: