Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca
  1. Pubblicazioni

Antibiotic appropriateness for Gram-negative bloodstream infections: impact of infectious disease consultation

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2023
Citazione:
Antibiotic appropriateness for Gram-negative bloodstream infections: impact of infectious disease consultation / Da Prat, Valentina; Galli, Laura; Cichero, Paola; Castiglioni, Barbara; Oltolini, Chiara; Tassan Din, Chiara; Andolina, Andrea; Bruzzesi, Elena; Poli, Andrea; Moro, Matteo; Mancini, Nicasio; Clementi, Massimo; Tresoldi, Moreno; Castagna, Antonella; Scarpellini, Paolo; Ripa, Marco. - In: INFECTIOUS DISEASES. - ISSN 2374-4235. - 55:4(2023), pp. 255-262. [10.1080/23744235.2023.2169345]
Abstract:
BackgroundWe investigated the role of infectious disease consultation (IDC) on therapeutic appropriateness in Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GNBSIs) in a setting with a high proportion of antibiotic resistance. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and the impact of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs).MethodsRetrospective study on hospitalised patients with GNBSIs. Therapy was deemed appropriate if it had the narrowest spectrum considering infection and patients' characteristics. Interventional-IDC (I-IDC) group included patients with IDC-advised first appropriate or last non-appropriate therapy. Time to first appropriate therapy and survival were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves. Factors associated with therapy appropriateness were assessed by multivariate Cox proportional-hazard models.Results471 patients were included. High antibiotic resistance rates were detected: quinolones 45.5%, third-generation cephalosporins 37.4%, carbapenems 7.9%. I-IDC was performed in 31.6% of patients (149/471), RDTs in 70.7% (333/471). The 7-day probability of appropriate treatment was 91.9% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 86.4-95.8%) vs. 75.8% (95%CI: 70.9-80.4%) with and without I-IDC, respectively (p-value = 0.0495); 85.5% (95%CI: 81.3-89.1%) vs. 69.4% (95%CI: 61.3-77.2%) with and without RDTs, respectively (p-value = 0.0023). Compared to RDTs alone, the combination with I-IDC was associated with a higher proportion of appropriate therapies at day 7: 81.9% (95%CI: 76.4-86.7%) vs. 92.6% (95%CI: 86.3-96.7%). At multivariate analysis, I-IDC and RDTs were associated with time to first appropriate therapy [adjusted hazard-ratio 1.292 (95%CI: 1.014-1.647) and 1.383 (95%CI: 1.080-1.771), respectively], with no impact on mortality.ConclusionsIn a setting with a high proportion of antibiotic resistance, IDC and RDTs were associated with earlier prescription of appropriate therapy in GNBSIs, without impact on mortality.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Elenco autori:
Da Prat, Valentina; Galli, Laura; Cichero, Paola; Castiglioni, Barbara; Oltolini, Chiara; Tassan Din, Chiara; Andolina, Andrea; Bruzzesi, Elena; Poli, Andrea; Moro, Matteo; Mancini, Nicasio; Clementi, Massimo; Tresoldi, Moreno; Castagna, Antonella; Scarpellini, Paolo; Ripa, Marco
Autori di Ateneo:
CASTAGNA ANTONELLA
CLEMENTI MASSIMO
RIPA MARCO
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/140542
Pubblicato in:
INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Journal
  • Dati Generali

Dati Generali

URL

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23744235.2023.2169345
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0