Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca
  1. Pubblicazioni

Everolimus with Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor Exposure in Renal Transplantation

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2018
Citazione:
Everolimus with Reduced Calcineurin Inhibitor Exposure in Renal Transplantation / Pascual, Julio; Berger, Stefan P.; Witzke, Oliver; Tedesco, Helio; Mulgaonkar, Shamkant; Qazi, Yasir; Chadban, Steven; Oppenheimer, Federico; Sommerer, Claudia; Oberbauer, Rainer; Watarai, Yoshihiko; Legendre, Christophe; Citterio, Franco; Henry, Mitchell; Srinivas, Titte R.; Luo, Wen-Lin; Marti, Anamaria; Bernhardt, Peter; Rigotti, Paolo; Vincenti, Flavio. - In: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY. - ISSN 1046-6673. - 29:7(2018), pp. 1979-1991. [10.1681/ASN.2018010009]
Abstract:
Background Everolimus permits reduced calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) exposure, but the efficacy and safety outcomes of this treatment after kidney transplant require confirmation.Methods In a multicenter noninferiority trial, we randomized 2037 de novo kidney transplant recipients to receive, in combination with induction therapy and corticosteroids, everolimus with reduced-exposure CNI (everolimus arm) or mycophenolic acid (MPA) with standard-exposure CNI (MPA arm). The primary end point was treated biopsy-proven acute rejection or eGFR<50 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at post-transplant month 12 using a 10% noninferiority margin.Results In the intent-to-treat population (everolimus n=1022, MPA n=1015), the primary end point incidence was 48.2% (493) with everolimus and 45.1% (457) with MPA (difference 3.2%; 95% confidence interval, -1.3% to 7.6%). Similar between-treatment differences in incidence were observed in the subgroups of patients who received tacrolimus or cyclosporine. Treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, or death at post-transplant month 12 occurred in 14.9% and 12.5% of patients treated with everolimus and MPA, respectively (difference 2.3%; 95% confidence interval, -1.7% to 6.4%). De novo donor-specific antibody incidence at 12 months and antibody-mediated rejection rate did not differ between arms. Cytomegalovirus (3.6% versus 13.3%) and BK virus infections (4.3% versus 8.0%) were less frequent in the everolimus arm than in the MPA arm. Overall, 23.0% and 11.9% of patients treated with everolimus and MPA, respectively, discontinued the study drug because of adverse events.Conclusions In kidney transplant recipients at mild-to-moderate immunologic risk, everolimus was noninferior to MPA for a binary composite end point assessing immunosuppressive efficacy and preservation of graft function.

Copyright © 2018 by the American Society of Nephrology.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
calcineurin inhibitor; efficacy graft; everolimus; function; kidney transplantation; randomized
Elenco autori:
Pascual, Julio; Berger, Stefan P.; Witzke, Oliver; Tedesco, Helio; Mulgaonkar, Shamkant; Qazi, Yasir; Chadban, Steven; Oppenheimer, Federico; Sommerer, Claudia; Oberbauer, Rainer; Watarai, Yoshihiko; Legendre, Christophe; Citterio, Franco; Henry, Mitchell; Srinivas, Titte R.; Luo, Wen-Lin; Marti, Anamaria; Bernhardt, Peter; Rigotti, Paolo; Vincenti, Flavio
Autori di Ateneo:
RIGOTTI PAOLO
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/156982
Pubblicato in:
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0