Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca
  1. Pubblicazioni

The added value of artificial intelligence using Quantib Prostate for the detection of prostate cancer at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2025
Citazione:
The added value of artificial intelligence using Quantib Prostate for the detection of prostate cancer at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging / Russo, T.; Quarta, L.; Pellegrino, F.; Cosenza, M.; Camisassa, E.; Lavalle, S.; Apostolo, G.; Zaurito, P.; Scuderi, S.; Barletta, F.; Marzorati, C.; Stabile, A.; Montorsi, F.; De Cobelli, F.; Brembilla, G.; Gandaglia, G.; Briganti, A.. - In: LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA. - ISSN 0033-8362. - 130:7(2025), pp. 1105-1114. [10.1007/s11547-025-02017-8]
Abstract:
Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) has been proposed to assist radiologists in reporting multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate. We evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiologists with different levels of experience when reporting mpMRI with the support of available AI-based software (Quantib Prostate). Material and methods: This is a single-center study (NCT06298305) involving 110 patients. Those with a positive mpMRI (PI-RADS ≥ 3) underwent targeted plus systematic biopsy (TBx plus SBx), while those with a negative mpMRI but a high clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) underwent SBx. Three readers with different levels of experience, identified as R1, R2, and R3 reviewed all mpMRI. Inter-reader agreement among the three readers with or without the assistance of Quantib Prostate as well as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) were assessed. Results: 102 patients underwent prostate biopsy and the csPCa detection rate was 47%. Using Quantib Prostate resulted in an increased number of lesions identified for R3 (101 vs. 127). Inter-reader agreement slightly increased when using Quantib Prostate from 0.37 to 0.41 without vs. with Quantib Prostate, respectively. PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy (measured by the area under the curve [AUC]) of R3 improved (0.51 vs. 0.55, 0.65 vs.0.82 and 0.56 vs. 0.62, respectively). Conversely, no changes were observed for R1 and R2. Conclusions: Using Quantib Prostate did not enhance the detection rate of csPCa for readers with some experience in prostate imaging. However, for an inexperienced reader, this AI-based software is demonstrated to improve the performance. Trial registration: Name of registry: clinicaltrials.gov. Trial registration number: NCT06298305. Date of registration: 2022-09.
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Elenco autori:
Russo, T.; Quarta, L.; Pellegrino, F.; Cosenza, M.; Camisassa, E.; Lavalle, S.; Apostolo, G.; Zaurito, P.; Scuderi, S.; Barletta, F.; Marzorati, C.; Stabile, A.; Montorsi, F.; De Cobelli, F.; Brembilla, G.; Gandaglia, G.; Briganti, A.
Autori di Ateneo:
BREMBILLA GIORGIO
BRIGANTI ALBERTO
DE COBELLI FRANCESCO
GANDAGLIA GIORGIO
MONTORSI FRANCESCO
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/191061
Pubblicato in:
LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA
Journal
  • Dati Generali

Dati Generali

URL

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11547-025-02017-8
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0