Skip to Main Content (Press Enter)

Logo UNISR
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca

UNIFIND
Logo UNISR

|

UNIFIND

unisr.it
  • ×
  • Home
  • Persone
  • Pubblicazioni
  • Facoltà
  • Ambiti Di Ricerca
  1. Pubblicazioni

Cardiac resynchronization therapy for enabling guideline-directed medical therapy optimization in heart failure

Articolo
Data di Pubblicazione:
2025
Citazione:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy for enabling guideline-directed medical therapy optimization in heart failure / Tomasoni, Daniela; Benson, Lina; Gatti, Paolo; Villaschi, Alessandro; Ljungman, Charlotta; Metra, Marco; Scorza, Raffaele; Braunschweig, Frieder; Melin, Michael; Rosano, Giuseppe; Böhm, Michael; Butler, Javed; Abraham, William T; Mullens, Wilfried; Gadler, Fredrik; Linde, Cecilia; Lund, Lars H; Savarese, Gianluigi. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE. - ISSN 1879-0844. - (2025). [10.1002/ejhf.3719]
Abstract:
Aims: We aimed to assess whether cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) might serve as an enabler for guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) optimization. Methods and results: Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) enrolled in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry between January 2009 and August 2022 were considered. Patients receiving a CRT close to the index registration were the cases, whereas controls had not received a CRT despite having an indication. Overall, 1543 (25%) HFrEF cases and 4537 (75%) controls were analysed in the intention-to-treat analysis. At baseline, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) and loop diuretic use was 84% versus 86%, 89% versus 88%, 57% versus 46% and 62% versus 59% in patients receiving versus not receiving CRT, respectively. At 1.5-year follow-up, patients receiving a CRT more likely experienced an improved use/dose of beta-blocker therapy (46% vs. 35%) and decreased loop diuretic use/dose (30% vs. 24%) versus controls. These associations were consistent after adjustments (odds ratio [OR] 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-2.13, and OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07-1.48, respectively), and confirmed in the per-protocol analysis (i.e. after excluding controls who received a CRT during follow-up). A significant association between CRT and the likelihood of ACEi/ARB/ARNi and MRA optimization (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.04-1.44, and OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.05-1.50, respectively) was observed in the per-protocol analysis. Conclusions: In this large nationwide real-world population with HFrEF, CRT implantation was associated with enabled use/dose of heart failure GDMT and decreased loop diuretic need (use/dose).
Tipologia CRIS:
1.1 Articolo in rivista
Keywords:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Guideline‐directed medical therapy; Heart failure; Loop diuretics; Optimization
Elenco autori:
Tomasoni, Daniela; Benson, Lina; Gatti, Paolo; Villaschi, Alessandro; Ljungman, Charlotta; Metra, Marco; Scorza, Raffaele; Braunschweig, Frieder; Melin, Michael; Rosano, Giuseppe; Böhm, Michael; Butler, Javed; Abraham, William T; Mullens, Wilfried; Gadler, Fredrik; Linde, Cecilia; Lund, Lars H; Savarese, Gianluigi
Autori di Ateneo:
METRA MARCO
Link alla scheda completa:
https://iris.unisr.it/handle/20.500.11768/194097
Pubblicato in:
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE
Journal
  • Utilizzo dei cookie

Realizzato con VIVO | Designed by Cineca | 26.5.1.0